Trump & 'The Angry Democrats' : A New Twist?
POTUS Trump has referred on numerous occasions to '13 or 18' 'Angry Democrats'. One is a close friend of disgraced James Comey and conflicted individual, who was angry at being turned down as FBI Director. Many have assumed that Trump has been pointing us to Robert Mueller, the ex-Special Counsel. However, as REX explains, it may well have been someone else, the entire time.
Two days ago, POTUS Trump was asked about whether he believes Robert Mueller, the ex-Special Counsel, should appear in front of Congress. Part of his answer was as follows:
'And Bob Mueller is no friend of mine. I had conflicts with him. We had a business dispute, we had somebody that is in love with James Comey. We like James Comey. They were very good friends, supposedly best friends. May be not, but supposedly best friends. You look at the picture file and you see hundreds of pictures of him and Comey. And with all of that and other things, he wanted the FBI job. I don't know if anybody knows that, but as you know, he was considered for the FBI job, wanted it, and the day after he didn't get it, he became the special counsel. That's a conflict. And we had other things, but those are tremendous conflicts.
Listen to this. Your judge, call him a judge, is a–has a business dispute with me. Your judge has a fantastic relationship with James Comey. Well, he's a part of this. He lied to Congress, he leaked–he's a liar, a leaker. And your judge has a situation where he wanted to become the FBI director. We chose Director Wray instead and told him I'm sorry. That's–those are tremendous conflicts. Those are tremendous conflicts.'
This is not the first time that Trump has referred to 'Comey', the 'FBI Director', a mysterious 'business dispute', 'tremendous conflicts' and 'Bob Mueller'.
It is the first time that trump has referred to as a 'judge', however. More on that, in a minute.
Trump has used the former words on twitter together, in different ways, many times Lazy reporters have interpreted Trump's comments as referring to his refusal to appoint Mueller for an unprecedented third time as FBI Director, due to conflicts arising from his past business dispute with Mueller, who is also one of Comey's friends.
However, in my opinion, it is unlikely that Trump's been pointing us to Mueller.
Let's return to the two paragraphs above. Notice that the two statements 'And Bob Mueller is no friend of mine. I had conflicts with him'
'We had a business dispute, we had somebody that is in love with James Comey'
can be read together.
Or they can be read apart.
That's to say, the first statement can be true : Bob Mueller and Donald Trump are not friends.
And it can also be unrelated to the second statement. 'We' and 'somebody' may be referring not to Mueller, but to someone else entirely.
Who is Trump Talking About?
Seasoned observers of Trump know that he loves word games and ambiguity. Ambiguity is a strategic weapon that he uses to baffle and distract his enemies. It's important to realize that every word Trump uses, as well as the way he organizes them, is carefully chosen.
With that in mind, go to the second paragraph above, where Trump refers to a 'judge'.
Ask yourself: were there any 'judges' who were friends of James Comey, who wanted to be FBI Director?
Well, yes. There were two judges actually: Federal Judge, Henry Hudson, is one. But I don't think he is a friend of Comey.
But hey, what about New York State of Appeals Judge, Michael J Garcia? He also wants to be FBI Director.
And he is a very close friend of Comey. Consider this string of connections appears, between Garcia and Comey:
And look, here are Comey and Garcia together, at a 2014 SDNY DOJ anniversary. Garcia is on the left of Comey. That's Preet Bharara on the left of Garcia.
Oh, how about this? Garcia's wife? I can't find her name, but she was and perhaps still is, an FBI agent, working under Mueller and Comey. I wonder who she is and where she connects to the Obama administration, the Clintons, or perhaps even the Comey family.
I could be wrong, but here's my working theory : Garcia and Comey are very close friends. Garcia was short-listed as FBI Director, but POTUS Trump didn't nominate him. One of the reasons? Garcia is hopelessly conflicted.
The official explanation is that Garcia 'withdrew' from nomination, but I very much doubt it. I'm guessing that Garcia found out he wasn't nominated, had a major tantrum and dressed it up as 'withdrawing from consideration'.
But what about the 'business dispute'?
True, I can't find much evidence of business links between Garcia and Trump. That would be extremely difficult, given the numerous disputes Trump has been involved in, over the decades.
And it's possible that in this case, Trump was referring to Mueller.
It doesn't really matter. The connections above, tell you all you need to know.
My bet? Judge Garcia seems a seasoned prosecutor and well regarded judge. However, I'm almost certain that POTUS Trump may have been been directing us all this time to Garcia - and then, to Comey and Lynch.
Trump Translation Machine
Anyway, let's go back to the quote above and try to re-write it, with actual names:
'And Bob Mueller is no friend of mine. I had conflicts with him. 'We :Mueller/Garcia/Comey?' had a business dispute, we have Garcia, who is in love with James Comey. We like James Comey. They were very good friends, supposedly best friends. May be not, but supposedly best friends. You look at the picture file and you see hundreds of pictures of Garcia and Comey. And with all of that and other things, Garcia wanted the FBI job. I don't know if anybody knows that, but as you know, Garcia was considered for the FBI job, wanted it, and the day after Garcia didn't get it, Mueller became the special counsel. That's a conflict. And we had other things, but those are tremendous conflicts.
Listen to this. Your judge Garcia, call him a judge, is a–has a business dispute with me. Your judge has a fantastic relationship with James Comey. Well, he's a part of this. Comey lied to Congress, he leaked–he's a liar, a leaker. And your judge (Garcia) has a situation where he wanted to become the FBI director. We chose Director Wray instead and I told Garcia I'm sorry. That's–those are tremendous conflicts. Those are tremendous conflicts.'
Apart form the remaining ambiguity about the 'business dispute', which may be a 'red herring', the translation checks out, right?
A Strange Coincidence
Oh, another thing. Remember that DOJ investigation into FIFA, above? The FakeNews had been dominated by it at fever pitch all through April and May, 2015. Indictments were announced on May 27, 2015, by A G Lynch, with global interest.
Guess what was published at the same time, specifically on May 5, 2015? Well, what do you know - 'Clinton Cash', by Peter Schweizer. Perhaps the last honest article on the New York Times, "Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal," had been published on April 23.
Just a coincidence that FIFA indictments were rolled out and took over the headlines, at exactly the same time as Uranium One, I guess.
An amazing coincidence, nonetheless.
A Last Word - On FakeNews & Angry Democrats
Is Judge Garcia one of Trump's 'angry democrats'?
Could be. Or again, Trump could be using Garcia to point us to James Comey and Loretta Lynch.
We will learn the truth, soon enough.
One last word : FakeNews, to my knowledge, have never even made the connection. Let alone raised any questions, about who Trump is referring to.
Maybe they don't want to.
We know that the FakeNews is incurious. At worst, many of these so-called reporters have been lying to the public, for a long time. I found these links and connections in this article myself, using a laptop, open sources and a curious mind.
How can they have missed these links, with all the resources and connections at their disposal?
Doesn't seem possible, given that almost all are card-carrying leftist Democrats. Many plugged into the Democrat world, as well.
Some of the FakeNews reporters are corrupt - paid DNC, Obama and Clinton lugenpresse. But as their failure here proves yet again, almost all of the mainstream media are also woefully incompetent.
Corrupt or incompetent. Or both.
Either way, FakeNews has been complicit in the greatest scandal in American history.
As POTUS Trump has said from the start.
And as this article proves, once again.